NASA-UAP-D008, Apollo 12 Medical Debriefing - Tape 12, 1969

59
SHARE Reddit X Facebook HN Email
Agency
NASA
Category
apollo
Type
VIDEO
Event Date
1969
Released
2026-05-22
Size
151.0 MB
Location
Texas

During a medical debriefing of the crew of the Apollo 12 mission, Commander Charles “Pete” Conrad, Command Module Pilot Richard “Dick” F. Gordon, and Lunar Module Pilot Alan L. Bean describe their observations of instances of light flashes or “streaks of lights.” The astronauts each reported that these experiences occurred in the dark as they tried to sleep.The NASA medical team considered whether similar phenomena reported by Apollo 11 Lunar Module Pilot Buzz Aldrin had been attributable to exposure of the retina by cosmic rays. NASA later determined that the phenomena reported by the Apollo 12 flight crew were internal to the astronauts’ vision rather than external light sources.

The summary above is sourced from the released file metadata as published to war.gov. The analysis sections below are original to this tracker.

Where this file fits in the PURSUE archive

This file is one of NASA's 22 files in the Trump PURSUE disclosure. Within the NASA agency block it ranks #15 of 22 by Anomalousness Index. Across the entire 222-file archive it ranks #102 of 222.

That places it in the lower-scoring band of the archive (102 of 222 by score), typical of investigative-record style files where the report is paper-based rather than instrumented.

Anomalousness Index: 59/100

Evidentiary weight that this encounter remains unexplained after conventional analysis. Not a probability of extraterrestrial origin - that number is not honestly computable from the released files and this tracker refuses to publish it.

🤖 AI-ASSISTED SCORING · methodology

The six rubric components break down for this file as follows. Each component has a weighted contribution to the final score; the per-component explanation below describes what this file's particular value on that component means in the rubric's framework.

sensor quality (eyewitness only) 30 × 0.25 = 7.5

Reported by a witness with no instrumented record. The lowest tier in the rubric's sensor axis. Eyewitness perception in field conditions, even when the witness is highly credentialed, scores below capture by any instrumented modality.

witness credibility (astronaut) 95 × 0.2 = 19.0

Astronaut witness on the official federal record. The highest tier in the rubric and essentially unique in the PURSUE archive - only the Borman/Lovell Gemini 7 file fits this tier, which is the structural reason it is the sole 72 in the archive.

corroboration (single witness instrument) 60 × 0.2 = 12.0

Single-witness or single-instrument capture. Every file in the PURSUE archive scores at this corroboration tier on the released metadata - the rubric records the honest limit of the underlying record rather than inferring multi-witness corroboration that the released summaries do not establish.

kinematic anomaly (no kinematic data) 30 × 0.15 = 4.5

No kinematic measurements - speed, acceleration, vector - are published in the released file with sufficient precision to score on the kinematic axis. The rubric does not infer kinematic anomaly from narrative observer estimates. Every file in the archive carries this value, which is itself an observation about the disclosure: kinematic-grade telemetry was not part of what was released.

mundane explanation available (weak mundane candidate) 70 × 0.1 = 7.0

A conventional candidate explanation has been considered but is not dispositive. Every file in the archive scores this way - reflecting that the underlying release metadata systematically caveats strong determinations in either direction. The released summaries warn against reading them as conclusive analytical judgments, and the rubric respects that.

official disposition (open after review) 90 × 0.1 = 9.0

Released as open after formal review by the originating agency. The file passed through a review process and was published in that posture - a stronger disposition signal than 'unresolved with no review,' because review has occurred and the open status is the agency's published conclusion.

Bottom line on the score: the Anomalousness Index of 59/100 reflects evidentiary weight that this specific file's encounter remains structurally unexplained by the rubric's six axes - it is not a claim that the underlying event involved anything non-conventional, and it is not comparable across rubrics that use different weights. For the full per-axis weights and the rubric JSON, see /methodology.

Related files in NASA

Other PURSUE files in the same category, ranked by Anomalousness Index.

NASA · IMAGE SCORE 65

NASA-UAP-VM001, Apollo 12, 1969

NASA · IMAGE SCORE 65

NASA-UAP-VM002, Apollo 12, 1969

NASA · IMAGE SCORE 65

NASA-UAP-VM003, Apollo 12, 1969

NASA · IMAGE SCORE 65

NASA-UAP-VM004, Apollo 12, 1969

NASA · IMAGE SCORE 65

NASA-UAP-VM005, Apollo 12, 1969

NASA · IMAGE SCORE 65

NASA-UAP-VM006, Apollo 17, 1972

BROWSE ALL 222 FILES →

Verification

SHA-256 · verified against war.gov 2026-06-10:

ed6707b09c71306271c9b861c7c90683eba61f220a8cd6936089d5692141a739

This hash is the SHA-256 of the file body war.gov served on the verification date above. War.gov has re-processed some file bodies since first release (re-compression + OCR, no content removed - see /changes); we re-verify and record the change rather than silently serve a stale hash. How to check this yourself →

Source: war.gov/UFO (specific URL not in current manifest; if the file is video-type the DVIDS page is the canonical source)