DOW-UAP-D166, MUFON Reports Prepared for BAASS, November 2008
This document is an administrative, programmatic, or contractor-produced record related to the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP), a Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)-administered program active from 2008 to 2012. AAWSAP’s official scope of work identified 12 technical research areas relating to potential aerospace threats over a time horizon of more than 40 years. As part of the broader program record, the file documents how AAWSAP was scoped, organized, tasked, funded, executed, or described at a particular point in time. This November 2008 compilation appears to be a set of technical materials prepared by the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) for Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies (BAASS) under a separate supporting contract. The file presents MUFON-produced topical papers framed around AAWSAP’s technical research areas, including at least a paper on “Lift,” while treating historical and contemporary unidentified flying object or unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) reporting as a relevant source base for evaluating advanced aerospace capabilities.
The summary above is sourced from the released file metadata as published to war.gov. The analysis sections below are original to this tracker.
Text of the document
Machine-extracted from the PDF war.gov published (its text layer or OCR), so expect errors, especially in names, numbers and handwriting; the PDF is the authoritative copy. Lines that did not extract as readable text are left out. Showing about 992 words from pages 2, 3 of 26.
PAGE 2
Mutual UFO Network MUFON Advanced Technology Establishment Newport Beach, California Lift is defined as the force or forces that permit a vehicle to hover or remain at constant altitude in flight, without expelling fluids as with a jet engine or rocket, which would be the subject of propulsion. We examine live ways that lift can be generated on our planet and have concluded that the use of the magnetic field of the earth for propelling vehicles using superconductors has merit. ln addition, the study of superconductor materials and properties is a very attractive next step towards identifying the experiments having the potential of achieving gravity control. Ways to generate lift: technical approach and concepts A. For planets that have an atmosphere, it is possible to generate lift in three ways: I. By displacing the atmosphere with an object. For a balloon in air, lift is the upward force equal to the weighft? ollf the air displaced. If the balloon is filled with a gas that weighs less than the air displaced, there be anet µ,ward force. The famous rash of sightings from the late 1890's, recently reponed on by ~ 843(a)(2) _ at the Society for Scientific Exploration annual meeting in 2008, noted large numbers of airship reports having the ch11racteristics of lighter than air balloons. Today it seems that balloon technology is well understood and the rewards from pursuing these technologies are not of the breakthrough sort. 2. If a vehicle is made to move through the uir (perhaps by using a propeller or jet), lift is the component of aerodynamic force perpendicular to the motion direction. For an .airplane flying steadily horizontally, this force exactly baJnnces the force of gravity. The technology of airplanes is constantly pushed by the Government and many corporations. We see promising ideas emerging, such as those using digital simulation of fluid flows. They will get better and better but it's not unique nor does it have breakthrough potential. There is little evidence of anomalous reports of aliens in airplanes. 3. If a propeller shape is used, the axis can be made vertical and the blades push the air down, causing the vehicle to be suspended. VerticaJ takeoff or landing (VTOL) is e bit more interesting. For a helicopter, the blades are long and thin. Rotating blades inside a duct is the same pri nciple but may offer advantages for ooise, safety and fuel efficiency, leading one to consider ducted fans. Ducted fan designs may offer considerable advantage over helicopters. For UFOs, there are numerous reports of hovering craft. Unfortunately, the vast majority of them make little or no noise other than a humming sound, which suggests they do not move air around to stay afloat, since rapid air motion Page 1ofS BAASS CONFIDENTIAL Nov-08
PAGE 3
always makes a lot of noise. The extensive reports of hovering craft of varied shapes and sizes stronaiy suggest that they are using technologies beyond our CUJTeOt skills. One would think it not unreasonable that the propulsion systems that got them here would also pcm1it them to hover easily, especially ifthey involve gravity con1rol B. The possibility of using the earth's magnetic field has been suggested. and is scientifically not a problem. For plmcts that have a permanent magnetic field locally of size B, it is possible to create a magnetic dipole ofstrength M, providing a force on the dipole that is given by F-=M•gradB, and the orientation of the force dcpcoda both on the direction of the gradient ofthe field and the direction ofthe axis of the dipole. The torque on such a dipole is vector M X B. For the torque to be um, the axis direction to have a vertical force depends primarily on the latitude. If the dipole were made, for example, by a superoond»ming toroid, a misalignment of torque would have tmt tendency to tum it upside down and suck it right into the earth. However, if the toroid were spinning, the gyroscopic effects would countenct this tendency:, resulting in a wobbling motion. If some of the craft used toroidal supercooductors to get a large magnetic lll01DeDt, and spinning to avoid instability, the kind ofmotions one might expect would p_ossibly be the "'falling leaf' or that of a conical ro1ation. These have been obsctvcd. perhaps more in the past 1han recemly, aod oan be easily explained as a gyroscopic re.,ponse. There have been several reliable reports ofcompass disturbances associated with UFO flyovers, strongly suggesting large magnetic fields involved. C. Jt iR not 1bougbt that planets have a net charge, and therefore they haw no net elec1rostatio field. However, planets with atmospheres may have many local weather disturbances, resulting in abarge exchange. which we call lighting. Interestingly, even on a clear day at sea level, there is an electric field on earth of the order ofa hundred voltalmctor. Thia ia uacful for tloeting objects in the field Gust like Mil1ilam floated his oil drop to measure the cbaqc on an electron) only if the field strcogth does not axceed the corona ducbarge breakdown of the order of 100,000 volts/meter. Any object with a large charge in the atmosphm:e would be expected to show signs ofionization of80IDe ofthe atmospheric molecules close to the vehicle whare the field -..,..., Jtreogth would be largest, probably resulting in colored lights near anomalous craft. The idea of charging an entire C28ft to levitate in the earth's electric field is fundameo1ally sound, and would take high voltage generators to eet the energy to discharge the ions or electrons, whicMver is needed. The expected observables would be various kinds ofcolors ofglow close to the vehicle where the electric field snogth is 1-ge, caused by the mild ionization of a variety ofthe molecules found in air. However, knowlodge ofthe electric field strength at all times would seem neoes.,ary and it would be the equivalent ofconstantly flying in 1he optimum direction in a tlumda:storm. The 1eehnology issues would revolve around light weight and reliable high voltage
Where this file fits in the PURSUE archive
This file is one of DoD's 282 files in the Trump PURSUE disclosure. Within the DoD agency block it ranks #270 of 282 by Anomalousness Index. Across the entire 478-file archive it ranks #445 of 478.
That places it in the lower-scoring band of the archive (445 of 478 by score), typical of investigative-record style files where the report is paper-based rather than instrumented.
Anomalousness Index: 53/100
Evidentiary weight that this encounter remains unexplained after conventional analysis. Not a probability of extraterrestrial origin - that number is not honestly computable from the released files and this tracker refuses to publish it.
🤖 AI-ASSISTED SCORING · methodology
The six rubric components break down for this file as follows. Each component has a weighted contribution to the final score; the per-component explanation below describes what this file's particular value on that component means in the rubric's framework.
Reported by a witness with no instrumented record. The lowest tier in the rubric's sensor axis. Eyewitness perception in field conditions, even when the witness is highly credentialed, scores below capture by any instrumented modality. This report reached the federal record through the Department of War.
Trained U.S. military personnel reporting from an operational mission context. A high witness-credibility tier, ranked in the rubric below astronaut, trained-aviator, and federal-agent testimony. This is the witness profile shared by the entire AARO-submitted infrared-capture cluster that anchors the 66-point score band.
Single-witness or single-instrument capture. This is the corroboration tier for the overwhelming majority of the PURSUE archive on the released metadata - the rubric records the honest limit of the underlying record rather than inferring multi-witness corroboration that the released summaries do not establish. A small number of files with an independent second witness or instrument score on the multi-witness/multi-instrument tier above this one.
No kinematic measurements - speed, acceleration, vector - are published in the released file with sufficient precision to score on the kinematic axis. The rubric does not infer kinematic anomaly from narrative observer estimates. Every file in the archive carries this value, which is itself an observation about the disclosure: kinematic-grade telemetry was not part of what was released.
A conventional candidate explanation has been considered but is not dispositive. Every file in the archive scores this way - reflecting that the underlying release metadata systematically caveats strong determinations in either direction. The released summaries warn against reading them as conclusive analytical judgments, and the rubric respects that.
Catalogued as unresolved with no formal review process having concluded. This is the disposition for a large share of the archive's military infrared captures - the reports are logged into the system as unresolved, but no formal review has finalized. The rubric distinguishes this from 'open after review' because the absence of review is itself a status signal.
Bottom line on the score: the Anomalousness Index of 53/100 reflects evidentiary weight that this specific file's encounter remains structurally unexplained by the rubric's six axes - it is not a claim that the underlying event involved anything non-conventional, and it is not comparable across rubrics that use different weights. For the full per-axis weights and the rubric JSON, see /methodology.
Related files in DoD
Other PURSUE files in the same category, ranked by Anomalousness Index.
DOW-UAP-PR024, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2023
DOW-UAP-PR072, "ADMINISTRATIVE REVISION: IIR 1777 J0032 22 Kazakhstan - UAP in the vicinit…
DOW-UAP-PR106, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2020
DOW-UAP-PR108, Unresolved UAP Report, Western United States, 2020
DOW-UAP-PR109, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2015
DOW-UAP-PR110, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2020
Verification
SHA-256:
This hash is the SHA-256 of the file body war.gov served on the verification date above. War.gov has re-processed some file bodies since first release (re-compression + OCR, no content removed - see /changes); we re-verify and record the change rather than silently serve a stale hash. How to check this yourself →