Unresolved UAP Report, Iraq, May 2022

53
⬇ Download HD (2.2 MB)
SHARE Reddit X Facebook HN Email
Agency
DoD
Category
military
Type
PDF
Event Date
n/a
Released
2026-05-08
Size
2.2 MB
Location
Iraq
Status
REDACTED

The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of a still image derived from a U.S. military system in 2022. The original reporter digitally altered the imagery by adding a red line encircling an area of interest before submitting it to AARO. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D12, described the UAP as moving from north to northeast. The operator reported that they were unable to positively identify the UAP. Image Description: The image contains an encircled, elongated area of contrast in the top left quarter. The area of contrast increases in intensity along its length from top left to bottom right. This image description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.

The summary above is sourced from the released file metadata as published to war.gov. The analysis sections below are original to this tracker.

Where this file fits in the PURSUE archive

This file is one of DoD's 143 files in the Trump PURSUE disclosure. Within the DoD agency block it ranks #143 of 143 by Anomalousness Index. Across the entire 294-file archive it ranks #281 of 294.

That places it in the lower-scoring band of the archive (281 of 294 by score), typical of investigative-record style files where the report is paper-based rather than instrumented.

Anomalousness Index: 53/100

Evidentiary weight that this encounter remains unexplained after conventional analysis. Not a probability of extraterrestrial origin - that number is not honestly computable from the released files and this tracker refuses to publish it.

🤖 AI-ASSISTED SCORING · methodology

The six rubric components break down for this file as follows. Each component has a weighted contribution to the final score; the per-component explanation below describes what this file's particular value on that component means in the rubric's framework.

sensor quality (eyewitness only) 30 × 0.25 = 7.5

Reported by a witness with no instrumented record. The lowest tier in the rubric's sensor axis. Eyewitness perception in field conditions, even when the witness is highly credentialed, scores below capture by any instrumented modality.

witness credibility (military personnel) 80 × 0.2 = 16.0

Trained U.S. military personnel reporting from an operational mission context. The second-highest credibility tier in the rubric. This is the witness profile shared by the entire AARO-submitted infrared-capture cluster that anchors the 66-point score band.

corroboration (single witness instrument) 60 × 0.2 = 12.0

Single-witness or single-instrument capture. Every file in the PURSUE archive scores at this corroboration tier on the released metadata - the rubric records the honest limit of the underlying record rather than inferring multi-witness corroboration that the released summaries do not establish.

kinematic anomaly (no kinematic data) 30 × 0.15 = 4.5

No kinematic measurements - speed, acceleration, vector - are published in the released file with sufficient precision to score on the kinematic axis. The rubric does not infer kinematic anomaly from narrative observer estimates. Every file in the archive carries this value, which is itself an observation about the disclosure: kinematic-grade telemetry was not part of what was released.

mundane explanation available (weak mundane candidate) 70 × 0.1 = 7.0

A conventional candidate explanation has been considered but is not dispositive. Every file in the archive scores this way - reflecting that the underlying release metadata systematically caveats strong determinations in either direction. The released summaries warn against reading them as conclusive analytical judgments, and the rubric respects that.

official disposition (unresolved no review) 60 × 0.1 = 6.0

Catalogued as unresolved with no formal review process having concluded. This is the AARO baseline disposition for the 27-file score-66 cluster - the reports are logged into the system as unresolved, but no formal review has finalized. The rubric distinguishes this from 'open after review' because the absence of review is itself a status signal.

Bottom line on the score: the Anomalousness Index of 53/100 reflects evidentiary weight that this specific file's encounter remains structurally unexplained by the rubric's six axes - it is not a claim that the underlying event involved anything non-conventional, and it is not comparable across rubrics that use different weights. For the full per-axis weights and the rubric JSON, see /methodology.

Related files in DoD

Other PURSUE files in the same category, ranked by Anomalousness Index.

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR072, "ADMINISTRATIVE REVISION: IIR 1777 J0032 22 Kazakhstan - UAP in the vicinit…

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 66

Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, May 2022

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 66

Unresolved UAP Report, Iraq, May 2022

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 66

Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, July 2022

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 66

Unresolved UAP Report, Iraq, December 2022

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 66

Unresolved UAP Report, United Arab Emirates, October 2023

BROWSE ALL 294 FILES →

Verification

SHA-256:

d6614ddb85556a5ad5476be15798b97f16fc3396e42ceffd993548d1e3201389

This hash is the SHA-256 of the file body war.gov served on the verification date above. War.gov has re-processed some file bodies since first release (re-compression + OCR, no content removed - see /changes); we re-verify and record the change rather than silently serve a stale hash. How to check this yourself →

Source: https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/dow-uap-pr20.pdf