Unresolved UAP Report, Arabian Gulf, 2020

66
⬇ Download HD (82.8 MB) 📖 Deep dive: The 27 AARO Unresolved UAP files at score 66 This file is part of the densest cluster in the archive - all 27 walked through, by region READ →
SHARE Reddit X Facebook HN Email
Agency
DoD
Category
military
Type
VIDEO
Event Date
n/a
Released
2026-05-08
Size
82.8 MB
Location
Arabian Gulf
Status
REDACTED

The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of five minutes and 11 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation. Video Description: This video features incidentally recorded audio, which does not relate to the visual content described below. 00:00-00:30: No content. 00:31-03:24: The sensor pans down and to the right to focus on an area of contrast. The sensor tracks the area of contrast against the background for approximately three minutes, panning to maintain its position generally within the center of the frame. The sensor cycles contrast and zoom levels several times throughout, appearing as brief, bright white flashes across the frame. 03:25-04:23: The sensor cycles through reticles of various sizes while continuing to track the area of contrast. Between 04:20 and 04:23, the area of contrast briefly leaves the center of the sensor field-of-view. 04:24-04:50: The sensor field-of-view widens to zoom out from the scene, continuing to track the area of contrast. 04:50-04:54: The sensor stops tracking the area of contrast, at which point it exits the frame from the top left quadrant of the screen. 04:55-05:11: No content. This video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.

The summary above is sourced from the released file metadata as published to war.gov. The analysis sections below are original to this tracker.

Where this file fits in the PURSUE archive

This file is one of DoD's 171 files in the Trump PURSUE disclosure. Within the DoD agency block it ranks #77 of 171 by Anomalousness Index. Across the entire 334-file archive it ranks #92 of 334.

That places it in the archive's densest scoring band - 92 files tied at 66, anchored by AARO-submitted and Release-02/04 military infrared captures.

For the broader cluster context, this file is part of AARO Unresolved UAP - the 27-file Release-01 AARO unresolved cluster tied at 66 (the score-66 band now spans 92 files across four releases). The cluster page walks through all 27 member files with regional grouping, sensor breakdown, and standout analysis.

Anomalousness Index: 66/100

Evidentiary weight that this encounter remains unexplained after conventional analysis. Not a probability of extraterrestrial origin - that number is not honestly computable from the released files and this tracker refuses to publish it.

🤖 AI-ASSISTED SCORING · methodology

The six rubric components break down for this file as follows. Each component has a weighted contribution to the final score; the per-component explanation below describes what this file's particular value on that component means in the rubric's framework.

sensor quality (single sensor military) 80 × 0.25 = 20.0

This file from the Department of War is a single-sensor military capture - one instrumented platform, one modality, time-stamped and recoverable rather than a witness account. The rubric scores it below a multi-sensor capture because cross-modality confirmation (the same object seen by two independent sensor types at once) is the higher bar on this axis, and that confirmation isn't present here.

witness credibility (military personnel) 80 × 0.2 = 16.0

Reported by trained U.S. military personnel during an operational mission (2026-05-08) - the rubric's second-highest witness-credibility tier, one step below astronaut testimony. This profile is shared across the AARO-submitted infrared-capture cluster that anchors the archive's densest scoring band, at 66.

corroboration (single witness instrument) 60 × 0.2 = 12.0

On corroboration, this file from the Department of War - like every single-tier file in the PURSUE archive - is a single-witness or single-instrument capture per the released metadata. The rubric doesn't infer multi-witness confirmation the summaries don't actually establish; this score reflects the honest limit of what was released, not a judgment about the underlying event.

kinematic anomaly (no kinematic data) 30 × 0.15 = 4.5

The released file contains no speed, acceleration, or vector data precise enough to score on the kinematic axis - and that's true archive-wide, not specific to this file. The rubric declines to infer kinematic anomaly from a witness's narrative estimate of how fast something moved; that itself says something about what PURSUE actually released: descriptive accounts, not flight-path telemetry.

mundane explanation available (weak mundane candidate) 70 × 0.1 = 7.0

Every file in the archive, including this one, scores this tier: a conventional explanation was considered in the released record but isn't treated as dispositive. That's a pattern in how war.gov's own summaries are written - they consistently hedge against strong conclusions either way - and the rubric takes that hedging at face value rather than resolving it for them.

official disposition (unresolved no review) 60 × 0.1 = 6.0

This file from the Department of War is catalogued as unresolved, with no formal review process having concluded - logged into the system, but not yet finalized by any review. The rubric treats that differently from 'open after review,' because the absence of a completed review is itself part of the file's status, not a placeholder for one.

Bottom line on the score: the Anomalousness Index of 66/100 reflects evidentiary weight that this specific file's encounter remains structurally unexplained by the rubric's six axes - it is not a claim that the underlying event involved anything non-conventional, and it is not comparable across rubrics that use different weights. For the full per-axis weights and the rubric JSON, see /methodology.

Related files in DoD

Other PURSUE files in the same category, ranked by Anomalousness Index.

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR024, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2023

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR072, "ADMINISTRATIVE REVISION: IIR 1777 J0032 22 Kazakhstan - UAP in the vicinit…

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR106, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2020

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR108, Unresolved UAP Report, Western United States, 2020

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR109, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2015

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR110, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2020

BROWSE ALL 334 FILES →

Verification

SHA-256:

9db22223a0384d0439235fe6583cb5be5e7fd38f0d040fec8402ba2edbedd883

This hash is the SHA-256 of the file body war.gov served on the verification date above. War.gov has re-processed some file bodies since first release (re-compression + OCR, no content removed - see /changes); we re-verify and record the change rather than silently serve a stale hash. How to check this yourself →

Source (DVIDS): https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1006104/dow-uap-pr44-unresolved-uap-report-middle-east-2020

Direct video file: https://d34w7g4gy10iej.cloudfront.net/video/2605/DOD_111689115/DOD_111689115.mp4

📡 Subscribe via RSS 🔔 Watch on GitHub