NASA-UAP-D015, Astronaut Scientific Debriefings, 1962-1963
This file contains memoranda, correspondence, reports, and other materials relating to contemporary scientific interest in investigating the nature of luminous phenomena reported by astronauts John Glenn and Walter Schirra during spaceflight. This collection includes transcripts from NASA interviews and debriefings with both astronauts regarding those observations. It also contains details relating to scientific observations of atmospheric phenomena, including brief descriptions of luminous particles, experiences while aboard spacecraft, and circa 1955 theoretical analysis of meteoric particles entering the atmosphere. Pages 34-35, 55-56, 57-63, 64-113, and 122-127 feature content relevant to the PURSUE initiative.
The summary above is sourced from the released file metadata as published to war.gov. The analysis sections below are original to this tracker.
Text of the document
Machine-extracted from the PDF war.gov published (its text layer or OCR), so expect errors, especially in names, numbers and handwriting; the PDF is the authoritative copy. Lines that did not extract as readable text are left out. Showing about 989 words from pages 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 42 of 216.
PAGE 34
ROUGH DRAFI': l/13/62 MEMORANDUM to Director, Office of Space Sciences Subject: Considerations and(tecommendations of'Mtwmed detailed and factual description of his observations during the MA' 6 flight. He answered rather well the many and varied questions presented to him during the limited properly Q~"- o. a number of his observations remain of it is evident that the astronaut can perform various scien- tific experiments,~has the aeiil~y capability of doing com act so despite the many limitations imposed.by the. Mercury capsule. Some commezits*on f£01. Glenn's observations are presented of questions, Col. Glenn described the velocity field of the luminous particles, their brightness 8'1./i. outside the shadow of the spacecvaft, the coloring aBa sunlight and their shape. For the velocity field, the particles !all. moved at preeise)y the same speed and !!.ll,.moved a~ precisely the same direction except for particles coming very close to the spacecraft. This occurred similarl:i, :i,Q, all three orbits. From t.l¼e ~-eie Vconsiderations alone, it may be stated that the luminous Jparticles observed by Col. Glenn were not extra~errestial particles but were particles asso ciated with the spacecraft or ~fte la~@Mftg e~ the booster.
PAGE 35
The consistency in the observations on the three separate orbits would require that the particles were associated with the spacecraft itself ( I have heard that O'Keefe has i;c;r,r9~9d the life support system which ~ particlei and the luminosity. The fact that the coloring was a yellow-green and the eiiee~ive observational pi,e- became fluorescent in sunlight.~e particles observed in shadow were observed in the scattered light from the spacecraft and were probably illuminated only by visible ~~f the spectrum. The change of angles of the ~particles approaching close th the~ spacecraft~ be attributed to the repJesive charge HD the polarities of the particles and spacecraft were the same. The ability of Col. Glenn to observe the particles under improper dark adaptation ~ indicate'that an astronaut would be in a position to carry through a series of experi'1nents to investigate the physics of Q.QmROMS in the solar environment. P.1wpe1 ~d°\he various gases and dust particles ejected the spacheaft is in sunlight could be ~ by the dark adaptation, Col. Glenn was not able to descibe any
PAGE 36
significant observations of the sta/ ield or the moon. In the absenf e of atmospheric scattEring the sun appeared a brillant white, but showed no signs of corona . It is of interest, however_, to consider Col. Glenn's observation -.'t o{ '- band six to eight degrees above the horizon, with a haze layer about two degrees Although it has been speculated that wide at the top. ~5'~~1!:irl~-.eilli-il~e the multipa~wl:l:,ers of the 'window cause the high likely because of the variatio~ a.ad angle of ~ that he did not see any double imag~ing more, he was able to infii.is8a:ec that the stars e»serve
PAGE 37
recommendations ~paeP te ~a eperen+, following the very successful flight of the Mercury capsule. distributed scientific journal•. In this manner, '4;a.e obd servations would have wide distribution, be properly cridited to the observer, and pePtioala¥ly be edited for correctness . . . Additional support to the astronaut in carrying out scientific observations is warranted particularly in consideration of Col. Glenn's attiftude and interest in carrying out such observations. Several instruments may be added to the spacecraft, within engineering limitations~ to assist in obtaining further detail~data. Col. Glenn suggested that t.ae follo discussioms would be to his interest. Such follow-on discussion is strongely recommended for further questions and exchanges) ~ inform the astronaut aihalysis to ova~~ate-~eP-tao-astPeRa~t of the results of the~ and study of his observations. C . It is of se.e:~ a:t-importanli" that proper dark adaptation methods be incorporated into the spacecraft system so that the astronaut may optimize his visual observations. Investigations of the physics of OQB!!fteft~s and the feasibility of the ~l " th-tificial ~omet "experiment may be carried out directly by the astronaut in a relatively strai-ghtforward way. These experiments should be carried out ae eB Bi@eM ~~ the feasibility of this ~ .
PAGE 38
multi lier :Be! "b systeml ~ series of filters r:- tac ultra viole:!T) should be incorporated into the ~J1~h~~ consideration of the preseno/~lanned manned-space-flight-program, some reeommendatiGns are ~ciences for scientific exploration ei in the !Manned indluding such people as RGefte, ~Utt, Minnaert, Towsey, Sekera, asg £0 forta- to the scientific community as a scientific team fo¥ aireefllsupport of the astronaut-scientists "ao oei-e into sys-sola1Y spa~e.
PAGE 40
LOS ALAMOS SCIENTIFIC LABOltATOllY LOS ALAMOS, NEW MEXICO Dr. Jocelyn Gill Federal Office Bldg. No. 6 Dear Dr. Gill: -The June 29 issue of Science brought to my attention J. H. Glenn's comments on "Th.e High layer~'. It seemed possible that the layer he described could be accounted for as a region of relatively large nitrogen peroxide (N0 concentration, and the past two weeks have been spent in checking this hypothesis • Unfortunately I am not familiar with either photochemistry or upper atmosphere physics so the following analysis leaves much to be desired; the hypothesis seems tenable, however, so I would like to bring it to your attention. Effective path length and comparison with possible surface observations. Referring to Figure 1, the height (H) of a point at a distance (L) from a point on the surface of a sphere of radius (R) can be found from the formula which has the solution
PAGE 42
LOS ALAMOS SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY Fox- th, followins I will assume that the concentr.ation ot absorbins mo1ecu1es
Where this file fits in the PURSUE archive
This file is one of NASA's 40 files in the Trump PURSUE disclosure. Within the NASA agency block it ranks #32 of 40 by Anomalousness Index. Across the entire 450-file archive it ranks #185 of 450.
That places it in the lower-scoring band of the archive (185 of 450 by score), typical of investigative-record style files where the report is paper-based rather than instrumented.
For the broader cluster context, this file is part of John Glenn's Fireflies - the classified NASA scientific investigation of Glenn's 1962 'fireflies' sighting and Carpenter's real-time audio confirmation from Mercury Atlas 7. The cluster page walks through all 2 member files with regional grouping, sensor breakdown, and standout analysis.
Anomalousness Index: 59/100
Evidentiary weight that this encounter remains unexplained after conventional analysis. Not a probability of extraterrestrial origin - that number is not honestly computable from the released files and this tracker refuses to publish it.
🤖 AI-ASSISTED SCORING · methodology
The six rubric components break down for this file as follows. Each component has a weighted contribution to the final score; the per-component explanation below describes what this file's particular value on that component means in the rubric's framework.
No sensor, camera, or instrument backs this observation - it is testimony, relayed through NASA, and scored on the rubric's lowest sensor-quality tier for that reason. That doesn't bear on the witness's credibility (a separate axis); it reflects only that nothing beyond human perception recorded the event.
This 1962-1963 account comes from an astronaut on the official federal record - NASA's highest-credibility witness tier in the rubric, spanning debriefings and mission transcripts from Mercury through Apollo. It's one of six score components, not a standalone verdict; the astronaut-witness files that also score highest on sensor quality and disposition are the eight tied at the archive's top score of 72.
On corroboration, this file from NASA - like every single-tier file in the PURSUE archive - is a single-witness or single-instrument capture per the released metadata. The rubric doesn't infer multi-witness confirmation the summaries don't actually establish; this score reflects the honest limit of what was released, not a judgment about the underlying event.
The released file contains no speed, acceleration, or vector data precise enough to score on the kinematic axis - and that's true archive-wide, not specific to this file. The rubric declines to infer kinematic anomaly from a witness's narrative estimate of how fast something moved; that itself says something about what PURSUE actually released: descriptive accounts, not flight-path telemetry.
Every file in the archive, including this one, scores this tier: a conventional explanation was considered in the released record but isn't treated as dispositive. That's a pattern in how war.gov's own summaries are written - they consistently hedge against strong conclusions either way - and the rubric takes that hedging at face value rather than resolving it for them.
This file was released as open by NASA after a formal review process concluded - not simply logged and left pending. That's a stronger disposition signal than 'unresolved, no review': a review actually happened, and remaining open is NASA's own published conclusion from it, not an absence of one.
Bottom line on the score: the Anomalousness Index of 59/100 reflects evidentiary weight that this specific file's encounter remains structurally unexplained by the rubric's six axes - it is not a claim that the underlying event involved anything non-conventional, and it is not comparable across rubrics that use different weights. For the full per-axis weights and the rubric JSON, see /methodology.
Related files in NASA
Other PURSUE files in the same category, ranked by Anomalousness Index.
NASA-UAP-D003A, Gemini 7 Audio Excerpt, 1965
NASA-UAP-D023, Interview Excerpt with Astronaut Gordon Cooper, 1962
NASA-UAP-D030, STS-80 Unidentified Object Image 1, 1996
NASA-UAP-D031, STS-80 Unidentified Object Image 2, 1996
NASA-UAP-D032, STS-80 Unidentified Object Image 3, 1996
NASA-UAP-D003, Gemini 7 Transcript, 1965
Verification
SHA-256:
This hash is the SHA-256 of the file body war.gov served on the verification date above. War.gov has re-processed some file bodies since first release (re-compression + OCR, no content removed - see /changes); we re-verify and record the change rather than silently serve a stale hash. How to check this yourself →