FBI-UAP-D037, FD-302, “Multiple Red Lights,” 2026
This document is an FBI FD-302, a form the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) uses to record interviews. This FD-302 records a 2026 interview with a U.S. person, in which the interviewee describes three incidents potentially involving unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) in the western United States occurring within a 5-hour period in 2026. A second individual who was present at the time also provided an interview, recorded in this collection as “FBI-UAP-D040.” Two FBI digital renderings based upon the observer’s descriptions accompany this document, under the titles FBI-UAP-D038 and FBI-UAP-D039.
The summary above is sourced from the released file metadata as published to war.gov. The analysis sections below are original to this tracker.
Text of the document
Machine-extracted from the PDF war.gov published (its text layer or OCR), so expect errors, especially in names, numbers and handwriting; the PDF is the authoritative copy. Lines that did not extract as readable text are left out. Showing about 971 words from pages 1, 2, 3 of 3.
PAGE 1
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Date ofentry ~ interviewed by Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Special Agent (SA) SA and After being advised on the identities of the interviewing agents, - provided the following Prior t o his current r ole had previously worked for l ocati on on the central/northern portion of - Weather condition at the time was rainy with significant cloud cover. Approximately 30 minutes after passing through the (approximately pulled over to the side of the road and exited the vehicle to investigate. - described the lights as "dash" shaped and dul l red in color t o t he naked eye . The l ights moved along the ridgeline of the mountains t o his west . - was equipped with Night Optical Devices (NODs) and observed the lights through said optics as well . - relayed that, despite being "dash shaped" to the naked eye, the lights appeared "orb- like" or circular thr ough the NODs, with the characteristic "NOD halo" around them, which is typical when l ooking at a l i ght source through NODs . - stated that he is very fami liar with using NODs, as he has been using them for 25+ years and has many hours of experience . - stated that he has astigmatism and while the objects appeared "dash-shaped" t o him, stated they appeared triangular or diamond-shaped, which could possibly be attributed t o - After approximately 20 minutes, both of the aforementioned unidentified lights disappeared. Shortly thereafter - observed, another, similar United States . Investigation on This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions ofthe FBI. It is the property ofthe FBI and is loaned to your agency; it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency.
PAGE 2
unidentified l i ght appear directly above their location and was vi sible for of their positi on and appeared t o be approximately 500 feet above their vehicl e . The uni denti fied light appeared t o move t oward them and stopped moved t oward, and then stopped in proximity of, t he first . The second l ight appeared to be approximately 6 feet off the ground. As wat ched the two unident ified l i ghts t o t he east, he noti ced light i n hi s peri pheral vi sion descend from altitude and stop in a dry wash approximately 100 meters behind them. Although - could not di rectl y see the light source, he observed the gl ow emanating from the wash. watched the glow move through the wash. entered their vehicle and drove up t o t he next i ntersection in attempt to get a better view of t he unidentified l ights to t heir east. Upon arri val, the l ights were no longer observed. - - returned to their ori ginal position, but were unable t o re-acquir e the unidentifi ed lights . walked 10-20 meters away from the vehicle to l ook around the area; - remained near the vehicle. At t hi s t ime, - adjusted the filter on hi s NODs to l ook at hi s watch, which displ ayed approximately 1: 00am (estimated based on memory) . - s watch was a Men's Aut omatic Analog Watch. - wal ked back discrepancy, compared the time displ ayed on hi s watch to the time displ ayed on his phone and observed that the t ime on his watch was 25 minutes ahead of the time on his phone and the vehicl e ' s digital cl ock. - relayed the discrepancy t o ■■■■■, whose digital watch displayed the same t ime as the phones and vehi cle cl ock. - stated that he had owned t hat watch for approximately 5 years, and i t had never been off by more than 60- 90 seconds . - had last checked the t ime on his watch at approximately 10:00pm, and i t was accurate at that t ime. - stated that hi s watch was the onl y mechanical/analog/non-digital clock in the vi cinity at that time and it was the only clock that displ ayed a different time. - di d not adjust hi s wat ch or reset t he time for 24 hours to see i f it continued to malfunction; the wat ch conti nued t o keep accurate time but remained ~5 minutes fast .
PAGE 3
- t old agents that he had spent a considerable amount of time at a - facility looking up at t he night sky, and was famil iar with how stated that the lights he observed and described were unlike anything he had seen before . - stated that the l ights he observed on - did not behave like satellites, as satellites track linear across the sky, whereas these did not . - stated t he unidentified l ights moved around and changed direction, and al so appeared to be as low as 6 feet off the ground. The low-e l evation lights described would have been backdropped by the mountains and below the rel ative horizon he observed was not a UAS that he familiar with. - noted no exhaust or tail when these obj ects moved, and they exhibited no audible sound signature. - attempted to observed the objects through thermal optics, but was unsuccessful . noted no physi ological effects from the events . - stated that the observations did not induce a fear or agitation response - just cur iosity. conversed about thi s afterward, and given their backgrounds, found it strange that they did not feel fear or threatened during their observations . - provided his contact info rmation and was open t o further contact from
Where this file fits in the PURSUE archive
This file is one of FBI's 104 files in the Trump PURSUE disclosure. Within the FBI agency block it ranks #102 of 104 by Anomalousness Index. Across the entire 450-file archive it ranks #333 of 450.
That places it in the lower-scoring band of the archive (333 of 450 by score), typical of investigative-record style files where the report is paper-based rather than instrumented.
For the broader cluster context, this file is part of FBI Modern UAP Files - the FBI's modern UAP files: the 2022 Colorado Springs interview and the FBI-authenticated northeastern orb videos. The cluster page walks through all 47 member files with regional grouping, sensor breakdown, and standout analysis.
Anomalousness Index: 55/100
Evidentiary weight that this encounter remains unexplained after conventional analysis. Not a probability of extraterrestrial origin - that number is not honestly computable from the released files and this tracker refuses to publish it.
🤖 AI-ASSISTED SCORING · methodology
The six rubric components break down for this file as follows. Each component has a weighted contribution to the final score; the per-component explanation below describes what this file's particular value on that component means in the rubric's framework.
Reported by a witness with no instrumented record. The lowest tier in the rubric's sensor axis. Eyewitness perception in field conditions, even when the witness is highly credentialed, scores below capture by any instrumented modality. This report reached the federal record through the FBI.
Federal agency personnel (FBI investigators or equivalent) recording the report into the federal investigative system. Investigative credentials, but typically operating in a reactive rather than mission-active posture.
Single-witness or single-instrument capture. This is the corroboration tier for the overwhelming majority of the PURSUE archive on the released metadata - the rubric records the honest limit of the underlying record rather than inferring multi-witness corroboration that the released summaries do not establish. A small number of files with an independent second witness or instrument score on the multi-witness/multi-instrument tier above this one.
No kinematic measurements - speed, acceleration, vector - are published in the released file with sufficient precision to score on the kinematic axis. The rubric does not infer kinematic anomaly from narrative observer estimates. Every file in the archive carries this value, which is itself an observation about the disclosure: kinematic-grade telemetry was not part of what was released.
A conventional candidate explanation has been considered but is not dispositive. Every file in the archive scores this way - reflecting that the underlying release metadata systematically caveats strong determinations in either direction. The released summaries warn against reading them as conclusive analytical judgments, and the rubric respects that.
Catalogued as unresolved with no formal review process having concluded. This is the disposition for a large share of the archive's military infrared captures - the reports are logged into the system as unresolved, but no formal review has finalized. The rubric distinguishes this from 'open after review' because the absence of review is itself a status signal.
Bottom line on the score: the Anomalousness Index of 55/100 reflects evidentiary weight that this specific file's encounter remains structurally unexplained by the rubric's six axes - it is not a claim that the underlying event involved anything non-conventional, and it is not comparable across rubrics that use different weights. For the full per-axis weights and the rubric JSON, see /methodology.
Related files in FBI
Other PURSUE files in the same category, ranked by Anomalousness Index.
FBI-UAP-PR001, “Triangle Orbs,” Northeastern United States, 2021
FBI-UAP-PR002, “Red Orb Rotation,” Northeastern United States, 2022
FBI-UAP-PR003, “Orbs Over the Pond,” 2024
FBI-UAP-PR004, “Northeastern Orb Sighting,” 2025
FBI-UAP-PR005, Digital Recreation, Narrative Statement 3-1, Western United States Event, 2…
FBI-UAP-PR006, Digital Recreation, Narrative Statement 3-2, Western United States Event, 2…
Verification
SHA-256:
This hash is the SHA-256 of the file body war.gov served on the verification date above. War.gov has re-processed some file bodies since first release (re-compression + OCR, no content removed - see /changes); we re-verify and record the change rather than silently serve a stale hash. How to check this yourself →