FBI-UAP-D001, FD-302, Unresolved UAP Report, Colorado Springs, 2022

55
⬇ Download HD (374.7 KB)
SHARE Reddit X Facebook HN Email
Agency
FBI
Category
fbi
Type
PDF
Event Date
February, 2022
Released
2026-06-12
Size
374.7 KB
Original Filename
FBI-UAP-D001_FD-302_Unresolved-UAP-Report_ColoradoSprings_2022.pdf
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado, U.S.
Status
REDACTED

This document is a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) FD-302, a form the FBI uses to record interviews. This FD-302 contains a summary of an interview with a U.S. military service member in March 2025 regarding a February 2022 incident potentially involving unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP). The individual described the phenomenon as being “bean shaped,” “matte white” or “off-white” in color, with a surface covered in “intersecting lines or ridges which formed an abstract polygon pattern.” The individual described the phenomenon as “motionless” and that “no sound could be heard coming from it.” FBI Note: AARO has since been in contact with the interviewee to conduct subsequent interviews to inform its analysis of this incident.

The summary above is sourced from the released file metadata as published to war.gov. The analysis sections below are original to this tracker.

Text of the document

Machine-extracted from the PDF war.gov published (its text layer or OCR), so expect errors, especially in names, numbers and handwriting; the PDF is the authoritative copy. Lines that did not extract as readable text are left out. Showing about 564 words from pages 1, 2 of 2.

PAGE 1

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ■ On March ■ 2025, - was interviewed via Microsoft Teams by Special Agent (SA) , and Supervisory Special Agent (SSA) present for the intervi ew was After being advised of the identity of the interviewing agents and the nature of the interview, - provided the following information: ■ The UAP si ghting occurred on a workday i n early February 2022, at approximately 1:00 or 2:00PM in the Fort Carson. He and four other persons from his unit, i ncluding his - drove the short distance over to the That day it was pleasant wi th clear blue ski es. After they parked, they were walking west towards the entrance of the building. It was natural to look west because of the beautiful view of Cheyanne Mountain. ■ At that time, - and the four other soldiers wi th him all noticed a very strange object that appeared to be hovering just over Cheyanne mountain, in a low point or "saddle" in the mountain. - described the object as being mat te white, or off-whi te i n color and appearing non­ metallic . The object was oval shaped and i n a hori zontal posi t i on, wi th a curved indentation on the bottom. - descri bed the object as being "bean­ shaped". The object was complet ely motionless and no sound could be heard comi ng from i t. All f i ve of the men saw the object and were poi nting i t out This document contains neither recommendations norconclusions oftheFBI. It is the propertyoftheFBI and is loaned to your agency; it and its contents are not to be distributed outside youragency.

PAGE 2

to each other. ■ did not believe the object was drifting in the wind because they observed the object for approximately 3-5 minutes, and it did not change its position rel ative to the saddl e of the mountain during that time. The object was covered in intersecti ng lines or ridges which formed an abstract polygon pattern which covered the entire object. - stated the object was about the size of 10% of the saddl e of the mountains, or about the size of a pool cue at arms-length. None of the five men had a phone on them They all simultaneously looked away momentarily to decide to have one of them go back to the vehicle to get a phone to take a video. When they looked back the object had vanished. They searched the western skyline but wer e not able find the object again. ■ They were all confused what they shoul d do next, They got together afterwards to di scuss what they had seen. They wondered if they had seen a UAP, and went through the alternatives it could have been, such as a blimp or a weather balloon. Each of them independently drew what they remembered the object to look like, and then t hey compared their drawings afterwards. All of the drawings were consistent i n showing a horizontal , white, "bean-shaped" object with abstract lines crossing on it. - believed that made an official report to the army about their observation. - stated he was contacted by AARO in early 2024 about their observation. He stated he provided a response, but that he was never interviewed by AARO or anyone el se.

Where this file fits in the PURSUE archive

This file is one of FBI's 104 files in the Trump PURSUE disclosure. Within the FBI agency block it ranks #87 of 104 by Anomalousness Index. Across the entire 450-file archive it ranks #318 of 450.

That places it in the lower-scoring band of the archive (318 of 450 by score), typical of investigative-record style files where the report is paper-based rather than instrumented.

For the broader cluster context, this file is part of FBI Modern UAP Files - the FBI's modern UAP files: the 2022 Colorado Springs interview and the FBI-authenticated northeastern orb videos. The cluster page walks through all 47 member files with regional grouping, sensor breakdown, and standout analysis.

Anomalousness Index: 55/100

Evidentiary weight that this encounter remains unexplained after conventional analysis. Not a probability of extraterrestrial origin - that number is not honestly computable from the released files and this tracker refuses to publish it.

🤖 AI-ASSISTED SCORING · methodology

The six rubric components break down for this file as follows. Each component has a weighted contribution to the final score; the per-component explanation below describes what this file's particular value on that component means in the rubric's framework.

sensor quality (eyewitness only) 30 × 0.25 = 7.5

No sensor, camera, or instrument backs this observation - it is testimony, relayed through the FBI, and scored on the rubric's lowest sensor-quality tier for that reason. That doesn't bear on the witness's credibility (a separate axis); it reflects only that nothing beyond human perception recorded the event.

witness credibility (federal agent) 90 × 0.2 = 18.0

The witness here is FBI personnel, entering the report into the federal investigative system through standard channels. That's one of the rubric's higher credibility tiers - trained federal investigative staff, weighted level with a trained aviator and below only an astronaut witness - though the posture is reactive (responding to a report) rather than an active operational context.

corroboration (single witness instrument) 60 × 0.2 = 12.0

On corroboration, this file from the FBI - like every single-tier file in the PURSUE archive - is a single-witness or single-instrument capture per the released metadata. The rubric doesn't infer multi-witness confirmation the summaries don't actually establish; this score reflects the honest limit of what was released, not a judgment about the underlying event.

kinematic anomaly (no kinematic data) 30 × 0.15 = 4.5

The released file contains no speed, acceleration, or vector data precise enough to score on the kinematic axis - and that's true archive-wide, not specific to this file. The rubric declines to infer kinematic anomaly from a witness's narrative estimate of how fast something moved; that itself says something about what PURSUE actually released: descriptive accounts, not flight-path telemetry.

mundane explanation available (weak mundane candidate) 70 × 0.1 = 7.0

Every file in the archive, including this one, scores this tier: a conventional explanation was considered in the released record but isn't treated as dispositive. That's a pattern in how war.gov's own summaries are written - they consistently hedge against strong conclusions either way - and the rubric takes that hedging at face value rather than resolving it for them.

official disposition (unresolved no review) 60 × 0.1 = 6.0

This file from the FBI is catalogued as unresolved, with no formal review process having concluded - logged into the system, but not yet finalized by any review. The rubric treats that differently from 'open after review,' because the absence of a completed review is itself part of the file's status, not a placeholder for one.

Bottom line on the score: the Anomalousness Index of 55/100 reflects evidentiary weight that this specific file's encounter remains structurally unexplained by the rubric's six axes - it is not a claim that the underlying event involved anything non-conventional, and it is not comparable across rubrics that use different weights. For the full per-axis weights and the rubric JSON, see /methodology.

Related files in FBI

Other PURSUE files in the same category, ranked by Anomalousness Index.

FBI · VIDEO SCORE 70

FBI-UAP-PR001, “Triangle Orbs,” Northeastern United States, 2021

FBI · VIDEO SCORE 70

FBI-UAP-PR002, “Red Orb Rotation,” Northeastern United States, 2022

FBI · VIDEO SCORE 70

FBI-UAP-PR003, “Orbs Over the Pond,” 2024

FBI · VIDEO SCORE 70

FBI-UAP-PR004, “Northeastern Orb Sighting,” 2025

FBI · VIDEO SCORE 70

FBI-UAP-PR005, Digital Recreation, Narrative Statement 3-1, Western United States Event, 2…

FBI · VIDEO SCORE 70

FBI-UAP-PR006, Digital Recreation, Narrative Statement 3-2, Western United States Event, 2…

BROWSE ALL 450 FILES →

Verification

SHA-256:

22528109268e1ed19d3a10f35d91b66077b674315c283e3ba6e3714743c41f4f

This hash is the SHA-256 of the file body war.gov served on the verification date above. War.gov has re-processed some file bodies since first release (re-compression + OCR, no content removed - see /changes); we re-verify and record the change rather than silently serve a stale hash. How to check this yourself →

Source: https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/061226/release_03/documents/FBI-UAP-D001_FD-302_Unresolved-UAP-Report_ColoradoSprings_2022.pdf

📡 Subscribe via RSS 🔔 Watch on GitHub