DOW-UAP-D003, Mission Report, Arabian Gulf, 2020

53
⬇ Download HD (98.7 KB)
SHARE Reddit X Facebook HN Email
Agency
DoD
Category
military
Type
PDF
Event Date
n/a
Released
2026-05-08
Size
98.7 KB
Original Filename
dow-uap-d3-mission-report-arabian-gulf-2020.pdf
Status
REDACTED

This document is a Mission Report (MISREP), a standardized reporting form the U.S. Military uses to record the circumstances surrounding its operations. U.S. military services often use MISREPs to report Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) to AARO. The GENTEXT, or “general text” section of these reports often contains important qualitative, contextual information, distinguishing it from the more quantitative, or numerical, data found elsewhere in the report. A U.S. military operator reported observing a “line of dots followed by a trailing dot.” All descriptive and estimative language contained in this report reflects the reporter’s subjective interpretation at the time of the event. Such characterizations should not be interpreted as a conclusive indication of the presence or absence of any intrinsic object features or performance characteristics.

The summary above is sourced from the released file metadata as published to war.gov. The analysis sections below are original to this tracker.

Text of the document

Machine-extracted from the PDF war.gov published (its text layer or OCR), so expect errors, especially in names, numbers and handwriting; the PDF is the authoritative copy. Lines that did not extract as readable text are left out. Showing about 510 words from pages 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 of 7.

PAGE 1

• Classification: SECRET • Classification Source (MS or Classification Guide ID): (b)(1)1.4a • Declassification Date (YYYYMMDD): 20480603 • Major Command (MAJCOM): AFCENT • Combatant Command (COCOM): (b)(1)1.4a • Report Type: MISREP • Originator (Unit or Squadron): (b)(1)1.4a • Submit Date (Auto-generated):

PAGE 2

• Tasking Order (ATO): (b)(1)1.4a • ATO Mission Number: (b)(1)1.4a • Country Tasked: US -UNITED STATES • Service: Air Force • Service: Air Force • Service: Air Force

PAGE 3

• Full Name: • Phone Number: • Operations Center: • Radar Name or Destination: • Radar Software Load or Mission Data: • Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) Name or Designator: • RWR Software Load or Mission Data: • MWS Name or Designator: • MWS Software Load or Mission Data: • IRCM Name or Designator: • IRCM Software Load or Mission Data: • ECM Name or Designator: • ECM Software Load or Mission Data: • CMD Name or Designator: • Chaff Designator: • Num Chaff or Cartridges: • Flare Designator: • Num Flares: • Type of Radar-Guided AAM: • Num Radar-Guided AAM: • Type of IR-Guided AAM: • Num IR-Guided AAM: • Gun Name or Designator: • Num Gun Rounds: • Air-to-Ground Wpn to Include Num of Each: (b)(1)1.4a

PAGE 4

• Data Link: • Number of Aircraft: (b)( • Mode 3 (IFF Codes): • Gentext/Additional Details: (SECRET//REL TO USA, FVEY) WEATHER WAS (NOT) A FACTOR (EXPLAIN WHY IF IT WAS) • Mission Canceled: • Last Land Location (ICAO Code): (b)(1)1.4a • Last Land Time: (b)(1)1.4a • Last Engine Shutdown Time: (b)(1)1.4a • Total Mission Time: (b)(1)1.4a • BE Number (if NTISR): - • Tasked Start Point: (b)(1)1.4a • Activity Description: ISR • FMV or Image File Name (if NTISR): - • EEIs Observed: • Number of EEIs:

PAGE 6

• Killbox (Location): • JTAC Callsign: • Did not Arrive On Station: Off Station • Total Time On Station: (b)(1)1.4a • UAP Event Type: (b)(1)1.4a • UAP Maneuverability Observations: • UAP Response to Observer Actions: • Friendly Aircraft Trajectory: • Observer Assessment of UAP: • Friendly Aircraft Speed: (b)(1)1.4a • Observation Interrogation of UAP (yes/no; if yes list sensor(s) and returns):: • Third-party Observers and/or Reporters: • Friendly Aircraft State: • Training Range (If applicable): • Operational Range: • UAP First Seen Location: (b)(1)1.4a • UAP Altitude, Depth, Velocity, and Trajectory (indicate estimated or measured): • UAP Physical State: (b)(1)1.4a • Number of UAP Sighted: (b)( • UAP Propulsion Means: • UAP Payload: • UAP Under Intelligent Control (yes/no; if yes, describe): • UAP Signatures: • UAP Advanced Capabilities And/Or Materials (yes/no; if yes, describe): NO • UAP Event Serial Number: -

PAGE 7

• UAP Effects on Persons: • UAP Objects/Material Recovered (yes/no; if yes, describe): • UAP Effects on Equipment: • Full Name: • UAP Description (e.g., size, shape, color, markings, recognizable features): 4X UAP OBSERVED FLYING IN (b)(1)1.4a FOV. CLOUD COVERAGE OBSTRUCTED (b)(1)1.4a FROM FOLLOWING AND GETTING A CLEAR VISUAL. (SEE ISR 1). • Gentext (UAP Event Description): AT APPROX 1736Z 4 UAP WERE OBSERVED BENEATH (b)(1)1.4a 1X UAP OBSERVED AT 17:36:22, 2X UAP OBSERVED SIDE BY SIDE AT 17:36:30, AND 1X UAP OBSERVED AT 17:36:49.

Where this file fits in the PURSUE archive

This file is one of DoD's 257 files in the Trump PURSUE disclosure. Within the DoD agency block it ranks #163 of 257 by Anomalousness Index. Across the entire 450-file archive it ranks #337 of 450.

That places it in the lower-scoring band of the archive (337 of 450 by score), typical of investigative-record style files where the report is paper-based rather than instrumented.

Anomalousness Index: 53/100

Evidentiary weight that this encounter remains unexplained after conventional analysis. Not a probability of extraterrestrial origin - that number is not honestly computable from the released files and this tracker refuses to publish it.

🤖 AI-ASSISTED SCORING · methodology

The six rubric components break down for this file as follows. Each component has a weighted contribution to the final score; the per-component explanation below describes what this file's particular value on that component means in the rubric's framework.

sensor quality (eyewitness only) 30 × 0.25 = 7.5

Reported by a witness with no instrumented record. The lowest tier in the rubric's sensor axis. Eyewitness perception in field conditions, even when the witness is highly credentialed, scores below capture by any instrumented modality. This report reached the federal record through the Department of War.

witness credibility (military personnel) 80 × 0.2 = 16.0

Trained U.S. military personnel reporting from an operational mission context. A high witness-credibility tier, ranked in the rubric below astronaut, trained-aviator, and federal-agent testimony. This is the witness profile shared by the entire AARO-submitted infrared-capture cluster that anchors the 66-point score band.

corroboration (single witness instrument) 60 × 0.2 = 12.0

Single-witness or single-instrument capture. This is the corroboration tier for the overwhelming majority of the PURSUE archive on the released metadata - the rubric records the honest limit of the underlying record rather than inferring multi-witness corroboration that the released summaries do not establish. A small number of files with an independent second witness or instrument score on the multi-witness/multi-instrument tier above this one.

kinematic anomaly (no kinematic data) 30 × 0.15 = 4.5

No kinematic measurements - speed, acceleration, vector - are published in the released file with sufficient precision to score on the kinematic axis. The rubric does not infer kinematic anomaly from narrative observer estimates. Every file in the archive carries this value, which is itself an observation about the disclosure: kinematic-grade telemetry was not part of what was released.

mundane explanation available (weak mundane candidate) 70 × 0.1 = 7.0

A conventional candidate explanation has been considered but is not dispositive. Every file in the archive scores this way - reflecting that the underlying release metadata systematically caveats strong determinations in either direction. The released summaries warn against reading them as conclusive analytical judgments, and the rubric respects that.

official disposition (unresolved no review) 60 × 0.1 = 6.0

Catalogued as unresolved with no formal review process having concluded. This is the disposition for a large share of the archive's military infrared captures - the reports are logged into the system as unresolved, but no formal review has finalized. The rubric distinguishes this from 'open after review' because the absence of review is itself a status signal.

Bottom line on the score: the Anomalousness Index of 53/100 reflects evidentiary weight that this specific file's encounter remains structurally unexplained by the rubric's six axes - it is not a claim that the underlying event involved anything non-conventional, and it is not comparable across rubrics that use different weights. For the full per-axis weights and the rubric JSON, see /methodology.

Related files in DoD

Other PURSUE files in the same category, ranked by Anomalousness Index.

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR024, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2023

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR072, "ADMINISTRATIVE REVISION: IIR 1777 J0032 22 Kazakhstan - UAP in the vicinit…

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR106, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2020

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR108, Unresolved UAP Report, Western United States, 2020

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR109, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2015

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR110, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2020

BROWSE ALL 450 FILES →

Verification

SHA-256:

58219b8000454aa27424ead9530bf80420365a587b95d4c770a5dce916783b45

This hash is the SHA-256 of the file body war.gov served on the verification date above. War.gov has re-processed some file bodies since first release (re-compression + OCR, no content removed - see /changes); we re-verify and record the change rather than silently serve a stale hash. How to check this yourself →

Source: https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/dow-uap-d3-mission-report-arabian-gulf-2020.pdf

📡 Subscribe via RSS 🔔 Watch on GitHub