65_HS1-834228961_62-HQ-83894_Section_002
The FBI's 62-HQ-83894 case file includes investigative records, eyewitness testimonies, and public reports concerning Unidentified Flying Objects and flying discs documented between June 1947 and July 1968. The records include high-profile incident accounts, photographic evidence from sites like Oak Ridge, TN, and technical proposals regarding potential propulsion systems. Additional topics include convention programs, researcher accounts, and extensive media coverage from the period. This file is partially posted on FBI vault with more redactions and some pages missing. Included here is the complete case file with several newly declassified pages and only minor redactions.
The summary above is sourced from the released file metadata as published to war.gov. The analysis sections below are original to this tracker.
Text of the document
Machine-extracted from the PDF war.gov published (its text layer or OCR), so expect errors, especially in names, numbers and handwriting; the PDF is the authoritative copy. Lines that did not extract as readable text are left out. Showing about 996 words from pages 2, 4, 6 of 194.
PAGE 2
Office Memorandum • uNJ. / FROM SAC, San Francisco SUBJEC frLTING DISCS Reference is made to my letter to the Bureau dated July 28, 1947 entitled as above forwarding a. copy of a report f'urnished to me by Lieutenant Colonel DONAU) SPRINGER, A-2, Fourth .Air Force, Hamilton Field, California, set ting forth the results of inquiries made by his office concerning the reported As ot further interest to the Bureau in this regard, theii(..~ v--v: mitted herewith ghotos~atic copies of three letters dated August 4, 19 entitled "Investigation of FlyiDg Discs," furnished to ma by Major WILLIA){ R. GRAHAH, Deputy AC of S, A-2, A.rJq Air Forces, Hamilton Field, California, who is acting in the absence of Lieutenant Colonel SPRINGER, enclosillg copies of reports of additional reported sightings of flying discs by persons in Oregon and Arizona, together with the results of their investigations in that regard. It is noted that these investigations were conducted prior to the time Bureau instructions were issued that our own Bureau would conduct inquiries into the reported sightings of flying discs. ~- ~ Copies of these reports a.re being forwarded to ortl and Phoenix Offices for the completion of their files in connection with this subject. oc Portland (with enclosures - 3) Phoenix (with enclosures - 3)
PAGE 4
Office Me orandum SAC' NEi'fARK SUBJECT: !"LYING DISC H.EPOR'.IED AT HACKENSACK, NEW JERSEY Reference is made to tne teletYPe from the Newark Division to tne Bureau dated August 4, 194'7 stating tnat ''Flying Disc" had been repor ted to n~ ~een seen at HacKens;st!New Jersey on August J last by one CHARLES~E6 LIA, JR. and ',VILLIAJ..~UEX. CHARI.E0 CASELIA, JH., 287 Euclid Avenue, Hackensack, upon interview by Special Agent AR'IHUR F. WILLIAMS of this Division, stated that on Au~st J he had been standing with WILLIAM 'IRUEX, a soldier stationed at Fort Dix, obser ving a 11ham11 radio rig atop a two-story house on Simons Avenue, Hackensack. It was approximately 7:45 p.m., and tney were in this vicinity for t he purpose of meeting 'IRUEX1s girlir ieno, one JOYCE Mc FA!t.IAND. 'IRUEX commented to CASELIA that a chil d had apparently lost its balloon. <.;ASELLA looked and about a block or a hal1' block away noticed a rouna, black object moving from south to north and east of the stop wnere he and 'IRUEX were standing. CASELIA noticed tnat it was moving too fast to be an ordinary balloon, but he could not discern wnether it was globular in form or a disc. He said it was about thirty to forty inches in diameter moving north in a hori zontal plane about two hundred yards aoove the top of the nill at Sumnu.t Avenue and Simons Avenue. I~ proceeded at a steady ra~e, ellll.tted rio rays, and was moving fast enougn to reqUl.I'e tnem to turn tneir heads steadily in order to follow· it. 'IRUEX1s girlfriend came out about fifteen seconds after they first sighted it. They pointed it out to her, and she said that it looked like a bird on tne horizon so small. It faded out of sight shortly thereafter. CASELIA said that a line drawn along its apparent course of f .ligb.t would go from the vicinity of Bentlix, New Jersey to a point west of Westwood, New CASE.LIA also said tna~ a man on tne porch across tne street also noticed it and pointea it out to tne women. CASELIA said that this man seemed excited but did nothing about it. CASELLA. said tna~ he was positive it was no optical illusion. He was not facing into tne sun and saw tne object clearly. He also said tnat ne would have thought no~ning of it except ror the speed at which it was traveling. u coPrEs DES~ntf:lf ED
PAGE 6
Ultter to Bureau August 13, 1947 Miss JOYCE Mc FARIAND, 476 Simons Avenue, upon interview by Special Agent WILLIAMS, stated th.at the event in question occurred at about 7:30 on tne evening of Sunday, August 3. She said thai::. she was in the house when CASELIA or '.IRUEX ca.Lled to her. She went out immediately, and they pointed out the object in question. She saw it just before it disappeared over tne horizon, but she declared that it was in view from that time for appro:x:i.mately one minute. She said it was round and silver-blue in color and appeared to be revolving. She said that she did not recall making any comment that. it nught have been a bird and herself had no idea of wnat it coUJ.d be. In view of tne distance from which she noticed it, she said tnat it could not have been more than six inches in diameter but would have been mucn larger iI. she had been near to it. Miss :Mc FAH.IAND said that sne had never seen anything like it berore. She said that across tne street the BOOTHS, mother and daughter, were the only people sitting on tne porcn and she, herself, did not notice anyone pointing toward tne ooject in question. The only other person around, to her knowledge, was GLORIA '.IRUEX, sister of WILLI.AM '.IRUEX, wno remained in tne house and did not see the ooject at all. Mrs. WINFIELD S. BOOTH, 459 Simons Avenue, stated that she was on tne porch on tne evening in question with her mother but did not notice any unusual object in the sky nor had any man been present tnere to point out the object in question. The follovdng information was received from 'IRUEX through interview by Special Agent T. H01'lARD WALDRON: talion, 47tn Infantry Regiment, 9th Division, Fort Dix, New Jersey, adVised he was born ~pr1112, 1930 at Jersey Cit.y, New Jersey and completed eight and one nalf' years of school. He enlisted in tne United States Army on May 29, 194?. His mother is Mrs. CEA.CE FI~LDS of 88 Wales Avenue, River Ectge, Bergen County, New Jersey. 'IRU~X stated thai::. on Sunday, August 3, 1947, at 8:00 p.m., he was standing
Where this file fits in the PURSUE archive
This file is one of FBI's 104 files in the Trump PURSUE disclosure. Within the FBI agency block it ranks #31 of 104 by Anomalousness Index. Across the entire 450-file archive it ranks #195 of 450.
That places it in the lower-scoring band of the archive (195 of 450 by score), typical of investigative-record style files where the report is paper-based rather than instrumented.
For the broader cluster context, this file is part of FBI Case 62-HQ-83894 - the 18-PDF FBI central case file covering 1947-1968. The cluster page walks through all 18 member files with regional grouping, sensor breakdown, and standout analysis.
Anomalousness Index: 58/100
Evidentiary weight that this encounter remains unexplained after conventional analysis. Not a probability of extraterrestrial origin - that number is not honestly computable from the released files and this tracker refuses to publish it.
🤖 AI-ASSISTED SCORING · methodology
The six rubric components break down for this file as follows. Each component has a weighted contribution to the final score; the per-component explanation below describes what this file's particular value on that component means in the rubric's framework.
No sensor, camera, or instrument backs this observation - it is testimony, relayed through the FBI, and scored on the rubric's lowest sensor-quality tier for that reason. That doesn't bear on the witness's credibility (a separate axis); it reflects only that nothing beyond human perception recorded the event.
The witness here is FBI personnel, entering the report into the federal investigative system through standard channels. That's one of the rubric's higher credibility tiers - trained federal investigative staff, weighted level with a trained aviator and below only an astronaut witness - though the posture is reactive (responding to a report) rather than an active operational context.
On corroboration, this file from the FBI - like every single-tier file in the PURSUE archive - is a single-witness or single-instrument capture per the released metadata. The rubric doesn't infer multi-witness confirmation the summaries don't actually establish; this score reflects the honest limit of what was released, not a judgment about the underlying event.
The released file contains no speed, acceleration, or vector data precise enough to score on the kinematic axis - and that's true archive-wide, not specific to this file. The rubric declines to infer kinematic anomaly from a witness's narrative estimate of how fast something moved; that itself says something about what PURSUE actually released: descriptive accounts, not flight-path telemetry.
Every file in the archive, including this one, scores this tier: a conventional explanation was considered in the released record but isn't treated as dispositive. That's a pattern in how war.gov's own summaries are written - they consistently hedge against strong conclusions either way - and the rubric takes that hedging at face value rather than resolving it for them.
This file was released as open by the FBI after a formal review process concluded - not simply logged and left pending. That's a stronger disposition signal than 'unresolved, no review': a review actually happened, and remaining open is the FBI's own published conclusion from it, not an absence of one.
Bottom line on the score: the Anomalousness Index of 58/100 reflects evidentiary weight that this specific file's encounter remains structurally unexplained by the rubric's six axes - it is not a claim that the underlying event involved anything non-conventional, and it is not comparable across rubrics that use different weights. For the full per-axis weights and the rubric JSON, see /methodology.
Related files in FBI
Other PURSUE files in the same category, ranked by Anomalousness Index.
FBI-UAP-PR001, “Triangle Orbs,” Northeastern United States, 2021
FBI-UAP-PR002, “Red Orb Rotation,” Northeastern United States, 2022
FBI-UAP-PR003, “Orbs Over the Pond,” 2024
FBI-UAP-PR004, “Northeastern Orb Sighting,” 2025
FBI-UAP-PR005, Digital Recreation, Narrative Statement 3-1, Western United States Event, 2…
FBI-UAP-PR006, Digital Recreation, Narrative Statement 3-2, Western United States Event, 2…
Verification
SHA-256:
This hash is the SHA-256 of the file body war.gov served on the verification date above. War.gov has re-processed some file bodies since first release (re-compression + OCR, no content removed - see /changes); we re-verify and record the change rather than silently serve a stale hash. How to check this yourself →
Source: https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/65_hs1-834228961_62-hq-83894_section_2.pdf